InjuryPedestrian and bicycle accident
Pedestrian and bicycle accident claims in Arizona
If a driver hit you while you were walking or cycling in Arizona, you may have a claim against that driver's liability insurer, and often under your own auto policy's uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage. Arizona requires drivers to yield to pedestrians in a crosswalk (A.R.S. § 28-792) and treats a bicycle on the roadway as a vehicle, with lane position governed by A.R.S. § 28-815. Expect the insurer to argue you darted out or rode where you should not have; under pure comparative fault (A.R.S. § 12-2505) that reduces a claim, it does not end one. Most claims must be filed within two years (A.R.S. § 12-542), or preceded by a 180-day notice of claim if a public entity's crosswalk, signal, or road may be involved (A.R.S. § 12-821.01).

What Blueshoe does
The groundwork, in order, before you decide anything.
- 01
Fix the scene
Where you were in the roadway, the crosswalk markings and signal phase, sightlines, lighting, and the vehicle's damage pattern, documented with photos and the crash report before the intersection changes and memories fade.
- 02
Find the footage
Intersection cameras, nearby businesses, transit vehicles, and doorbell cameras hold the clearest answer to who had the right of way. Preservation requests go out in the first days, because many systems overwrite within weeks.
- 03
Read every policy
The driver's liability limits, your own auto policy's UM/UIM coverage, and a household member's policy that may extend to you on foot or on a bike. Pedestrian and cyclist injuries often exceed the 25/50/15 minimums under A.R.S. § 28-4009.
- 04
An attorney can take it forward
A licensed Arizona attorney can review the file, answer the comparative fault argument, present the claim to each insurer, and file suit if it is not resolved fairly, on terms stated in writing first.
What the law says
What the law says about pedestrian and bicycle accidents in Arizona
Who has the right of way at a crosswalk in Arizona?
The pedestrian, in most situations. Under A.R.S. § 28-792, a driver must yield, slowing or stopping if needed, to a pedestrian crossing within a marked or unmarked crosswalk on the driver's half of the roadway or approaching closely from the other half. The same statute tells pedestrians not to step suddenly into a vehicle's path.
Outside a crosswalk the duty to yield generally shifts to the pedestrian, which is why where you were crossing is usually the insurer's first question. The answer comes from the scene, the cameras, and the witnesses, not from the adjuster's assumption.
What rules apply to a cyclist hit by a car?
Arizona treats a bicycle on the roadway as a vehicle: a cyclist has the rights and duties of a driver. A.R.S. § 28-815 sets lane position, generally as close as practicable to the right edge when riding slower than traffic, with exceptions for passing, turning left, and avoiding hazards. Riding within those rules reframes fault from the start.
The insurer says I was jaywalking or riding outside the bike lane. Is my claim over?
No. Arizona follows pure comparative fault under A.R.S. § 12-2505: your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault, but the claim survives even if you were mostly to blame. A driver still owes a duty to keep a lookout and avoid people in the road. The adjuster's fault split is an opening position, not a verdict.
The driver had little or no insurance, or drove off. What then?
Your own auto policy may respond. Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage, which Arizona insurers must offer in writing under A.R.S. § 20-259.01, generally covers you as a person, including when you are hit on foot or on a bike, and uninsured coverage typically applies to a hit-and-run. A household member's policy may also extend to you.
How long do I have, and what if my child was the one hit?
Generally two years from the crash under A.R.S. § 12-542. If a public entity's crosswalk design, signal timing, or road may share fault, A.R.S. § 12-821.01 requires a notice of claim within 180 days and suit within one year. For a child's own claim, A.R.S. § 12-502 pauses the limitations period until the child turns 18.
What it costs
No fee unless you recover.
Asking costs nothing. If you engage Blueshoe on a contingency basis, the fee is a percentage of what is recovered, stated in a written engagement agreement, and nothing is owed if there is no recovery. Case costs, such as filing fees and records, are set out in the same agreement, including whether they come out before or after the fee is calculated.
- Free to ask
- Written assessment before any fee
- Engagement terms in writing
- No billable hours
Questions people ask
You may. Crossing outside a crosswalk shifts some fault to the pedestrian, but it does not remove the driver's duty to keep a lookout and avoid people in the road. Under pure comparative fault, your recovery is reduced by your share, not eliminated. Speed, lighting, distraction, and sightlines all bear on the driver's share.
More under Injury
- Car accidentsHurt in an Arizona crash? The two-year deadline, the 180-day notice for public entities, pure comparative fault, 25/50/15 minimum limits, and the UM/UIM coverage that often decides what a claim recovers.Read more
- Uninsured driversThe driver who hit you had no insurance, or not enough.Read more
- Brain & spinal injuriesA traumatic brain injury or a spinal cord injury changes what a claim has to prove.Read more

Legally reviewed by Catherine O’Grady, State Bar of Arizona No. 011647
Managing partner & chief compliance officer · 30+ years in practice · Reviewed 2026-10-08 · Full bio →